Skip to content

Review: Roger Mohrlang. Paul and His Life-Transforming Theology: A Concise Introduction.

From the Themelios website:

Paul and his Life-transforming theology

Roger Mohrlang. Paul and His Life-Transforming Theology: A Concise Introduction. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2013. xii + 170 pp. $21.00.

According to the author, this book “is designed to be a concise, inviting introduction to the greatest of the early Christian missionaries, the Apostle Paul” (p. ix). The book largely succeeds in achieving this aim. It has obviously grown from the author’s lifetime of work in Pauline scholarship, yet it is written in a non-technical style which renders it accessible to a range of audiences. Mohrlang engages with alternative views on a number of key issues, yet writes as a convinced and unashamed evangelical. He keeps the text of Paul’s letters as the primary focus of his work and does not allow himself to be distracted by unnecessarily detailed debates. He frames his discussions in an engaging and relevant manner, emphasising the element of personal / moral transformation in Paul’s theology. Furthermore, at the end of each chapter, he provides insightful suggestions for ways in which Paul’s theology might challenge modern evangelical culture.

In the first three chapters, Mohrlang discusses the relevance of Paul for today (ch. 1), introduces Paul’s letters—accepting all thirteen as authentic—(ch. 2), and provides a brief biography of Paul’s life, largely drawn from Acts (ch. 3). Unfortunately, the discussion of the individual letters in ch. 2 is a little too brief. Mohrlang himself warns that much of Paul’s writing “is not abstract theology but advice for specific issues that must be interpreted contextually” (p. 5). However, in these opening chapters he provides very little discussion of these specific issues, and his approach in the rest of the book is largely synthetic—various themes are discussed, quotations are used to illustrate the themes, and footnotes are provided to demonstrate places in the letters where the themes appear. A more detailed overview of the specific issues behind each of the letters in chapter 2 would have greatly helped readers to understand the context(s) of the subsequent discussion. Nevertheless, there is a helpful appendix on pp. 161–68 with details on the specifics of Paul’s letters. I suggest that teachers recommend that their students read this appendix between chapters 2 and 3.

The book treats the following themes in order: the person of Christ (ch. 4), the work of Christ with a focus on his death and resurrection (ch. 5), sin and judgment (ch. 6), the nature of salvation (ch. 7), divine election and human responsibility (ch. 8), justification (ch. 9), the Law (ch. 10), apocalyptic eschatology (ch. 11), the Spirit’s work in the Christian life (ch. 12), sin and assurance (ch. 13), motivation for ethical living (ch. 14), the church as the family of Christ (ch. 15), Christian hope (ch. 16), Paul’s mission and ministry (ch. 17), and finally—and quite helpfully—suffering in the Christian life (ch. 18).

Mohrlang is generally judicious in his choice of how much detail to enter into on debated issues. His choice of detail in each case depends on how close the issue is to his overall purpose to expound the life-transforming nature of Paul’s theology. On some issues, he provides little or no discussion at all: e.g., the role of women in church and family (he mentions women involved in gospel ministry, but claims that Paul largely conformed to the restrictive cultural norms of his day which are no longer seen as relevant by many Christians today, pp. 124–25). On the nature and future of “Israel”, he maintains that Paul has two quite different notions of “Israel” in mind: national Israel, for whom Paul enigmatically holds out some hope for salvation, and the “real” Israel, i.e., all believers in Christ (pp. 48–49). On the use of the Law, he provides a nuanced discussion of the Pauline texts themselves and affirms a moderate reformed position (the Law is not the means of salvation nor the comprehensive guide for daily living; it convicts people of sin and points them to Christ; nevertheless the moral commandments are still God’s will and as such are eternally valid), but does not enter into discussion on the various other views in Christian tradition and scholarship (pp. 69–80). On the meaning of debated phrases such as “the works of the law”, “the faith of Christ”, and “the righteousness of God”, he expresses his own views in the main text (“works of the law” refers to careful observance of all the commandments; “the faith of Christ” includes an objective genitive and refers to trust in Jesus Christ; “the righteousness of God” is the righteousness God attributes to people when they put their faith in Christ) but also provides a relatively extensive discussion of alternative views in footnotes (pp. 62–63). On the meaning of the “I” in Romans 7:14–25, he provides a detailed discussion of the alternatives in the main text before presenting his conclusion that the passage is not about the experience of believers (pp. 95–99). On the question of the relationship between divine election and human responsibility, he seems to give equal weight to the respective emphases of Calvinism and Arminianism (p. 53), concluding that Paul has a valuable yet “paradoxical” perspective (p. 59).

A very nice feature of the book is the plethora of extensive quotations from Paul’s letters. The translations are Mohrlang’s own, and are rendered in clear contemporary English. This translation style fits in well with Mohrlang’s aim to provide an accessible introduction to Paul’s letters. At times, however, Mohrlang’s translations over-interpret Paul’s words in such a way that theological conclusions are placed directly on Paul’s lips without sufficient warrant from the text at hand—for example, Mohrlang translates Romans 1:17 (lit. “the righteous one by faith will live”) as “the person who is considered righteous by faith will live” (p. 64, emphasis mine).

Overall, this book is a careful yet highly readable and concise summary of Paul’s theology. It is recommended for new students or ordinary Christian readers who are seeking an introductory-level overview of Pauline theology.

Lionel Windsor
St Augustine’s Anglican Church, Neutral Bay
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Published inPaul

Publications by Lionel Windsor:

  • Lift Your Eyes: Reflections on Ephesians

Recent blog posts

  • The Shambles, York, UKBuilt together (Ephesians 2:20–22)
    Is every church on its own? How are Christian believers connected with other believers with whom we don’t meet regularly: in our region, nation, and world?
  • “Do not weep for me, weep for yourselves…” (Luke 23:28)
    Why do Christians lament? Sometimes we lament out of sympathy, but sometimes we weep for ourselves. This is the kind of lament that Jesus calls for here.
  • Busts in Vatican Museum, RomeNo second-class Christians (Ephesians 2:19)
    Even if we don’t say it out loud, we can often act as if there are different classes of Christians. But the gospel teaches us there are no second-class Christians.
  • Photo by Larm Rmah on UnsplashChrist the missionary (Ephesians 2:17–18)
    Christ is a missionary. Christ does stranger evangelism. Christ preaches to the choir. Christ crosses cultures. Christ brings peace. So says the Apostle Paul. What does he mean?
  • Fragment of the Berlin WallChrist the wall breaker (Ephesians 2:14–16)
    In this broken and rebellious world, our healthy boundaries often become hostile walls. But the cross of Christ breaks down walls and brings reconciliation.
  • Photo by John Tyson on UnsplashThe blood that brings us close (Ephesians 2:11–13)
    Despite our best desires and efforts, we humans are not very good at living up close with others. This has become devastatingly obvious in the recent Christchurch shootings. Yet in his letter to the Ephesians, Paul talks about a conflict that really was healed. This passage is about a real closeness that all believers in Christ must remember: a closeness that is fundamental to our identity.
  • Photo by foundinbklyn on Flickr (CC BY 2.0)Good works and salvation: What’s the connection? (Ephesians 2:8–10)
    A joke letter from an Australian church offering its financial donors priority access to heaven raises questions for all of us. Do our good deeds give us access to heaven? Or are our good deeds irrelevant? Where do our good deeds fit when it comes to salvation?
  • Security Threat. Photo by Andrew Neel on UnsplashA question of security (Ephesians 2:6–7)
    As I write this, New Zealand is shocked and grieving. My own nation Australia is shocked and grieving too, along with them. But news stories about terror attacks and shootings in our world are far too common, aren’t they? And whenever we hear of them, they bring to mind all sorts of questions. One of them is the question of security. As we grieve for the victims, we also think a little about ourselves. We wonder whether some day we too might be in the wrong place at the wrong time when a seemingly random attack happens. It’s unsettling. It’s not just a matter of national security; it’s also a matter of our own personal security. Paul is talking in Ephesians 2:6–7 about a security that belongs to everyone who believes in Jesus Christ. It’s not a guarantee of perfect national security or job security or financial security or security in relationships and health. Nor is it a guarantee that we will always feel perfectly secure. But it is still a real security, more unshakeable and deep-rooted than any other kind of security could be. So what is this security, and where does it come from?
  • Walking past a telephone booth in OxfordThis love (Ephesians 2:4–5)
    “God loves you”: if I say just those three words, you may not hear what I want you to hear. This is because of a communication problem that arises whenever Christians try to talk about biblical concept of God’s “love”. When we say “love” we mean one thing—something wonderful and life-changing. But the word means quite different things to many English speakers. For example, the word “love” often means “strong desire”. So if I say “God loves you” then it might sound like I’m saying “God has strong feelings for you”. Another, increasingly common, understanding of “love” is the idea of “unconditional approval”. In this view, the way to “love” somebody is to affirm and approve of everything they do. So if I don’t approve of your actions and actively affirm everything you do, then by definition I’m not “loving” you (in fact, by definition I’m “hating” you). On this common definition of “love”, if I say “God loves you” then it might sound like I’m saying “God affirms everything about you and your actions”. But that’s not what the Bible means by God’s “love” either. Given this communication problem, how can I best explain the idea of God’s “love”? Well, it’s not actually that hard. The best way is to see how the word works when the Bible uses it. In Ephesians 2:4–5, Paul uses the word “love”. But he doesn’t just say “God loves you”. He explains and spells out what that love means. And he helps us to see what God’s love really means, and how amazing it is.
  • Entering a tomb in PompeiiWe too: the offenders (Ephesians 2:3)
    Judgmentalism. It’s a bigger problem than we think. Judgmentalism is certainly a danger for God’s people. That’s because God’s people have God’s word. God’s word helps God’s people to see how wonderful God is, and how terrible humanity is in comparison. But Ephesians 2:3 contains two highly significant, emphatic words: “we too”. We too, says Paul, were the offenders. We, too, were the disobedient. These words aren’t talking about all those horrible people “out there”. They’re talking about God’s people. And it’s something we, too, need to hear. These words tell us something incredibly important—something that we ignore at our peril.

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor