Skip to content

Paul describes his ministry in terms of Isaiah’s “Servant of the Lord” (Romans 1:1)

In my book, I argue that when Paul uses the term δοῦλος in Romans 1:1, he is drawing on the scriptural figure of the “Servant of the Lord” found in Isaiah 40 –55, especially (but not exclusively) in Isa 49:1–7. This “Servant” (δοῦλος) both represents Israel and also has a special role with respect to the nations.

Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul's Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to RomansI begin by providing positive evidence that Paul is using δοῦλος to describe himself in terms of the Isaianic Servant, examining Paul’s letters (especially Rom 1:1 and Gal 1:10-16) and comparing them with the relevant texts in Isaiah. I then deal with three common objections to the claim that Paul’s use of the term δοῦλος in Rom 1:1 is a reference to the Isaianic Servant.

The first objection is the claim that the term δοῦλος was normally used to denote a menial social position—slavery—and thus cannot denote a position of special distinctiveness such as that described in Isaiah for the “Servant.” There is plenty of evidence, however, that the term was often used to denote a position of special distinctiveness in Paul’s Jewish milieu. As a point of special significance:

Some scholars claim that the preferred LXX translation for עֶבֶד is παῖς, and that δοῦλος is much rarer. For example, Combes claims that in Isaiah, “παῖς is far more common [than δοῦλος] vis-à-vis the chosen men of God,” and cites Isa 49:6 LXX as the “classic expression of vocation”. If Combes’s claim were true, it may weaken our case that Paul’s self-designation as δοῦλος is an allusion to the figure of the Isaianic Servant, and in particular to Isa 49:1–7. 1 However, Combes’s claim simply does not stand up to close scrutiny (p. 105)

The second objection is that Paul is using δοῦλος in Rom 1:1 primarily to identify with his readers by invoking his common status as a slave of God, not to distinguish himself from them by invoking a special divine role for himself. Some scholars point to the fact that Paul elsewhere describes his readers using the δουλ- word-group (Rom 6–8, 12:11, 14:4). However:

However, since the word δοῦλος was such a common term, it was quite possible for the same author to use it in different ways. There is no compelling reason to assume that the meaning of the term in Rom 1:1 must be determined by its use five chapters later. The meaning of the word should, rather, be inferred directly from the immediate context. (p. 108)

The third objection arises from the claim that Greco-Roman economic or political
institutions provide a better and more straightforward context for his use of the term (e.g. the Greco-Roman manager slave, or a high-ranking slave from Caesar’s household). “Our discussion so far, however, has shown that the Jewish Scriptures are both necessary and sufficient to explain Paul’s intention in his use of the term δοῦλος in Rom 1:1.” (p. 110)

What is the significance of Paul’s allusion to the Isaianic Servant?

Paul is thus self-consciously appropriating a text which speaks explicitly about a soteriological dynamic between Israel and the nations. This, of course, undergirds the Jew-Gentile dynamic in Paul’s own apostolic ministry. Paul is thus not simply identifying with his Gentile readers, nor is he presenting himself as a unique prophetic figure.⁸⁰ Rather, Paul is placing his own apostolic ministry within the context of Israel’s distinct role vis-à-vis the nations (pp. 111-112).

The full details of the argument and further references may be found in chapter 4 of the book (pp. 99-112). The chapter is available from the publisher in electronic format:

Windsor, Lionel J. Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul’s Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to Romans. BZNW 205. Berlin / Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2014.

  1. Combes, I. A. H. 1998. The Metaphor of Slavery in the Writings of the Early Church: From the New Testament to the Beginning of the Fifth Century. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 156. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic. pp. 78-79
Published inIsaiahPaul

Publications by Lionel Windsor:

  • Lift Your Eyes: Reflections on Ephesians

Recent blog posts

  • Colosseum with cross-shaped cloudsChrist’s body: A brief history (Ephesians 4:11–13)
    Paul didn’t write Ephesians 4:11–13 to give us a detailed blueprint for how to organise our ministries. He wrote these verses to point us to God’s grace in Christ.
  • Cathedral CeilingChrist: Up there and down here (Ephesians 4:8–10)
    In these verses, Paul makes a big deal of Christ going up (to heaven) and down (to be with us by his Spirit). Why? to encourage believers as we face all the ups and downs of living for Christ.
  • Genesis 1:27 modified NIVMale and female: Equality and order in Genesis 1:27
    Genesis 1:27 is important in debates between egalitarians and complementarians. It clearly implies equality, yet also seems to suggest a certain order.
  • Gift among giftsGifted beyond measure (Ephesians 4:7)
    How should Christians think about our own individual ‘giftedness’? We need to see our own gifts in the light of God’s wonderful, superabundant grace.
  • Temple of Antoninus and Faustina, Roman ForumThe one and only God (Ephesians 4:4–6)
    In this part of Ephesians, the apostle Paul makes an unavoidably scandalous claim: The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is the one and only God.
  • Finding praise in the right place (Romans 2:28–29)
    There is a very strong temptation to measure your ministry by looking at how much people are praising you. This passage teaches us where to look for praise.
  • This unity (Ephesians 4:2–3)
    In the classic film Monty Python and the Holy Grail, the King of Swamp Castle issues an appeal for unity: “This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let’s not bicker and argue about who killed who!” It’s become a classic line used to poke fun at people who are trying to bring peace and unity without showing any understanding of the reality of the situation or the depth of hurt that’s been caused. While we might never end up being quite as absurd as Monty Python, Christians can sometimes talk about unity a little like this. That is, we can treat unity as some ideal state where everybody just gets on, no matter how deep our differences are and no matter what hurt has been caused. And yet—unity really matters. Christians are called to unity. Christian unity is anchored in the truth of the gospel.
  • Feet walking on cobblesThe truth on the ground (Ephesians 4:1)
    Our step by step living, in all the details of life, really matters for Christians. It’s not an optional extra; It’s intimately connected to our calling.
  • Elf on the Shelf Balloon. Photo by Kim on Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/thegirlsny/8208193899God: Beyond us—and with us (Ephesians 3:20–21)
    God is nothing like the Elf on the Shelf. God’s power is far beyond us. Yet God’s power is at work in us. So God’s glory is our joyful goal.
  • EducationWhen education is not the answer (Romans 2:17–27)
    When education is not the answer (Romans 2:17–27). Amongst all the pragmatics & demands & struggles of ministry, you first need to know the why of ministry. You need deep and strong theology, and to apply that theology to your life & ministry.

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor