Skip to content

Why does Paul call himself an “Israelite” in Romans 11:1?

Romans 11:1–2a is a major turning point in Paul’s argument:
Vocational Dimension of Jewish Identity

I ask, then: God has not rejected his inheritance, has he? Absolutely not! For I myself am an Israelite, from the seed of Abraham, tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. (Rom 11:1–2a)

Why does Paul invoke his own person at this pivotal moment to answer the issue concerning Israel’s salvation? In my book, I argue that:
Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul's Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to Romans

Paul is drawing attention to his existence, not simply as a saved Israelite, but as the preaching Israelite—the apostle to the Gentiles from Israel. Paul is arguing that Israel’s future is guaranteed because Israel’s divine vocation is in fact being fulfilled by an Israelite. (p. 232)

I first show the inadequacy of alternative proposals (pp. 232-235).

  • It cannot simply be understood in terms of rhetorical effect, since it occurs at a pivotal point in his argument.
  • Paul cannot simply be presenting himself as one example of a “faithful Jew” or an example of the “remnant”, since this explanation does not fit with the argument at this point nor with his situation with respect to his readers
  • Paul cannot be referring to his own paradigmatic conversion experience, since he is personally unknown to his readers and has not mentioned his conversion experience anywhere else in Romans.

Rather,

when Paul speaks positively of his status as “Israelite,” he is speaking of his status as God’s instrument to bring God’s revelation to the world. For Paul, God’s concern for Israel is bound up with God’s choice of Israel to achieve his wider purposes. The fact that it is an Israelite who is achieving God’s positive global purposes, therefore, demonstrates that God has not rejected Israel. (pp. 235-236)

So:

Paul’s self-description as an Israelite from the seed of Abraham and the tribe of Benjamin, therefore, provides the hinge for Israel’s transition from a negative role to a positive role in God’s worldwide purposes. (p. 238)

The full details of the argument and further references may be found in chapter 6 of the book (pp. 231-238). The chapter is available from the publisher in electronic format:

Windsor, Lionel J. Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul’s Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to Romans. BZNW 205. Berlin / Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2014.

Published inEvangelismFaithPaulRomans

Publications by Lionel Windsor:

  • Lift Your Eyes: Reflections on Ephesians

Recent blog posts

  • Ampelmann, BerlinTurn around and walk the other way (Ephesians 4:17–19)
    Darkness, futility, and desire: this is the way the world walks. Paul doesn’t write these things so that we can gloat or judge. He writes so we can repent, and live.
  • Photo by Kira auf der Heide on UnsplashPlaying your part (Ephesians 4:16)
    Paul’s vision for Christ’s body is unity in diversity. It’s not just flat uniformity, nor is it just diversity for the sake of diversity. It’s diversity for a common purpose.
  • Photo by Ben White on UnsplashThe truth in love: A key principle for church growth (Ephesians 4:14–15)
    Paul’s principle for the growth of Christ’s body isn’t about presentation or organisation. It’s more fundamental: “speaking the truth in love”.
  • Colosseum with cross-shaped cloudsChrist’s body: A brief history (Ephesians 4:11–13)
    Paul didn’t write Ephesians 4:11–13 to give us a detailed blueprint for how to organise our ministries. He wrote these verses to point us to God’s grace in Christ.
  • Cathedral CeilingChrist: Up there and down here (Ephesians 4:8–10)
    In these verses, Paul makes a big deal of Christ going up (to heaven) and down (to be with us by his Spirit). Why? to encourage believers as we face all the ups and downs of living for Christ.
  • Genesis 1:27 modified NIVMale and female: Equality and order in Genesis 1:27
    Genesis 1:27 is important in debates between egalitarians and complementarians. It clearly implies equality, yet also seems to suggest a certain order.
  • Gift among giftsGifted beyond measure (Ephesians 4:7)
    How should Christians think about our own individual ‘giftedness’? We need to see our own gifts in the light of God’s wonderful, superabundant grace.
  • Temple of Antoninus and Faustina, Roman ForumThe one and only God (Ephesians 4:4–6)
    In this part of Ephesians, the apostle Paul makes an unavoidably scandalous claim: The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ is the one and only God.
  • Finding praise in the right place (Romans 2:28–29)
    There is a very strong temptation to measure your ministry by looking at how much people are praising you. This passage teaches us where to look for praise.
  • This unity (Ephesians 4:2–3)
    In the classic film Monty Python and the Holy Grail, the King of Swamp Castle issues an appeal for unity: “This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let’s not bicker and argue about who killed who!” It’s become a classic line used to poke fun at people who are trying to bring peace and unity without showing any understanding of the reality of the situation or the depth of hurt that’s been caused. While we might never end up being quite as absurd as Monty Python, Christians can sometimes talk about unity a little like this. That is, we can treat unity as some ideal state where everybody just gets on, no matter how deep our differences are and no matter what hurt has been caused. And yet—unity really matters. Christians are called to unity. Christian unity is anchored in the truth of the gospel.

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor