Skip to content

Did Paul reject “Judaism?”

In the latest issue of the Journal of Theological Studies, James D. G. Dunn reviews the new multi-author book Paul within Judaism edited by Mark Nanos and Magnus Zetterholm. The book argues that Paul should be interpreted from within Judaism. Dunn, a proponent of the New Perspective on Paul, is quite unimpressed with the book as a whole and finds the specific critiques of the New Perspective underwhelming, to say the least!

I have yet to read the book, and don’t necessarily endorse all the ideas in it. However, I thought it worth making a comment here about Dunn’s final critique:

Still more surprising from my perspective is the fact that Paul’s use of the key phrase ‘in/within Judaism’, which occurs only in Gal. 1:13–14 (twice), is never really discussed, even by Anders Runesson, who explicitly addresses ‘The Question of Terminology’ (ch. 2). How can an attempt to (re)locate Paul ‘within Judaism’ ignore Paul’s only use of the phrase so completely? The point is that Paul uses the phrase only in reference to his pre-conversion self-understanding. The implication is that the converted Paul no longer thought of himself as ‘within Judaism’. This, of course, says nothing about Paul’s continued understanding of himself as a Jew (as in Acts 21:39; 1 Cor. 9:20; Gal. 2:15). And ‘Judaism’ as used in Gal. 1:13–14 should not be simply equated with ‘Judaism’ then or now; Paul the Jew certainly digs deeply into his Jewish and scriptural heritage. But the clear implication of Gal. 1:13–14 is that ‘in Judaism’ was used by Paul to describe or refer only to his pre-conversion self or status. So, quite how Nanos in his opening essay, but representative of the volume, can simply assert that Paul remained a representative within late Second Temple Judaism (pp. 9–10) without reference to this key text is somewhat baffling. It is very disappointing, then, that a collection of essays entitled ‘Paul within Judaism’ never really discusses what presumably should be regarded as the key text.

If Dunn is right that the book never properly discusses Galatians 1:13-14, that is unfortunate. However, there is an answer to his criticism. Dunn actually alludes to the answer when he says that “Judaism’ as used in Gal. 1:13–14 should not be simply equated with ‘Judaism’ then or now”. In fact, the term Ἰουδαϊσμός in Galatians 1:13-14 should not be translated as “Judaism” at all, if by “Judaism” we mean a general set of religious beliefs about God, salvation, etc. Rather, the word Ἰουδαϊσμός in Galatians 1:13-14 refers to something far more specific. It refers to a strong, often militant, commitment to preserving the Jewish way of life from the contaminating influence of Gentiles. It is a rare word, used only in 2 and 4 Maccabees (2 Macc 2:21; 8:1; 14:38 [2x]; 4 Macc 4:26) and twice in inscriptions. In each case, the word is describing a kind of revolutionary counter-movement that fought against foreign influences and sought to bring Jews back to true Jewish ways.

Galatians 1:13-14, then, is not making a direct statement about Paul’s rejection of “Second Temple Judaism”. Rather, Galatians 1:13-14 is simply saying that Paul had rejected one particular Jewish idea – Ἰουδαϊσμός. The Ἰουδαϊσμός Paul had rejected was a militaristic striving to preserve God’s people from contaminating influences, which he had expressed in his violent persecution of the Christian assemblies. Paul had repented of this attitude ofἸουδαϊσμός. The reason he rejected this form of violent striving is because of the revelation of Jesus Christ, which, among other things, made him realise that “all flesh”–i.e. both Jews and Gentiles–stand as sinners before God and in need of justification through faith in Christ (Gal 2:16ff.) In other words, Jews didn’t need protection from contamination by Gentiles. What they needed was justification through faith in Christ.

(More detail about this word is in my book Paul and the Vocation of Israel.)

There may be many other reasons to reject the claim that Paul should be interpreted from “within Judaism”. However, the reference to the word in Galatians 1:13-14 is not one of these reasons.

Published inGalatiansPaul

Publications by Lionel Windsor:

  • Lift Your Eyes: Reflections on Ephesians

Recent blog posts

  • Holding child's handImitators of God (Ephesians 5:1–2)
    Christians are God’s dearly loved children, raised from death to life and secure with him, now and forever. This is what gives us the power to sacrifice.
  • Preaching sermons and shepherding the flock: What’s the connection?
    Lionel Windsor | 2 Feb 2015 | Priscilla and Aquila Conference | Moore College, Sydney I’m here republishing my 2015 paper, which originally appeared as a PDF and video. See here for more on the
  • Photo: NASA/ISS CrewThe Amazon Fires: A Gospel Response
    Unprecedented numbers of fires are now burning in the Amazon rainforest. How can the gospel of Jesus Christ be brought to bear on the situation?
  • Photo by Xan Griffin on UnsplashThe Victory of the Cross
    According to the Bible, Jesus’ death on the cross is God’s victory and triumph—a victory and triumph Christ shares with all who trust in him... (Audio)
  • Photo by Lina Trochez on UnsplashThe power of forgiveness (Ephesians 4:31–32)
    Believers are to forgive, as God has forgiven us. Forgiveness is not only possible for believers, it’s also powerful for our lives and relationships.
  • Photo by Brett Jordan on UnsplashWords with purpose (Ephesians 4:29–30)
    Christians have a whole new reason to speak. Instead of rotten words or selfish words, we are to speak good words: word that build and give grace.
  • Photo by Ben White on UnsplashThe gospel for criminals (Ephesians 4:28)
    Paul preaches the gospel to thieves. God’s grace gives us a new identity. That means we have work to do: not so we can take, but so we can give.
  • Sun setting on ruinsGrace and anger (Ephesians 4:26–27)
    Whether our anger is right or wrong, we can’t deny it’s there. But because we belong to Christ, we must make it a priority to deal with anger. How?
  • Is God Green? By Lionel WindsorIs God Green? Audio/video links
    Here are some links to audio and video for events I've spoken at recently based on my book: Is God Green?
  • Donald Robinson Selected Works volumes 3 and 4Donald Robinson on the Origins of the Anglican Church League
    History matters. It makes us question things we take for granted, it helps us to understand who we are, and it gives us a broader perspective on the issues we face today. One example – relevant for evangelical Anglicans, especially in Sydney – is an essay in Donald Robinson Selected Works, volume 4 (recently published by the Australian Church Record and Moore College). The essay is called “The Origins of the Anglican Church League” (pp. 125–52). It’s a republication of a paper given in 1976 by Donald Robinson (1922–2018), former Moore College Vice-Principal and later Archbishop of Sydney. In the paper, Robinson traces some of the currents and issues that led to the formation of the Anglican Church League in the early twentieth century. The essay is classic Donald Robinson: full of surprises, yet definitely still worth reading today to help us gain perspective on issues for evangelical Anglicans past and present.

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor