Skip to content

ThLZ review: Paul and the Vocation of Israel

Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul's Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to RomansA review of my book Paul and the Vocation of Israel has appeared in the German journal Theologische Literaturzeitung. According to its website, “Die Theologische Literaturzeitung (ThLZ) is published monthly (in January / February and July / August as a double issue) and reviews nearly every major new release in German theology. It also reviews a wide range of publications from Anglo-American and Scandinavian countries as well as French, Spanish and Italian and other titles.” [translation]

I’ve translated the review of my book below for the sake of my English-speaking readers.

Extract:

W.s Arbeit kommt das sicher zu weiterem exegetischen Nachdenken anregende Verdienst zu, Paulus’ Bemühung um Selbstvergewisserung mittels seiner Jesajarezeption aufgegriffen und in Bezug zu paulinischen Judentum-Aussagen gesetzt zu haben.

[Translation] Windsor’s work deserves credit as it will certainly stimulate further exegetical reflection. He has taken Paul’s efforts in self-assurance, by means of his appropriation of Isaiah, and placed them in reference to Paul’s statements about Judaism.

 Original review (German)

Theologische Literaturzeitung

Felix John, “Windsor, Lionel J., Paul and the Vocation of Israel. How Paul’s Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to Romans,” Theologische Literaturzeitung 2016/3 (March 2016): 203–205.

Translation (English):

This dissertation by Lionel J. Windsor, minister in the Anglican Church of Australia, was produced in Durham under the supervision of Francis Watson. Windsor’s interpretation of Paul can be classified – at least from an outsider’s point of view – as belonging to the “Paul within Judaism Perspective” (also: “The New View of Paul” or “Radical New Perspective on Paul”). Both developing and critiquing the New Perspective on Paul, Windsor argues that the Apostle here should be understood as entirely Jewish – even and especially in his role as missionary to the Gentiles. This reduces (at least initially) any fundamental opposition between Judaism and Christian faith. For Windsor, Paul’s apostolic self-understanding and his Jewish identity belong together. The Gentile mission is the direct expression of Paul’s Jewishness (p. 1) – this is Windsor’s conclusion from his analysis of relevant texts from Romans. The epistle to the Romans, furthermore, documents Paul’s preoccupation with the fact that the majority of his fellow Jews have understood their Jewishness in other ways. Windsor designates these the members of “mainstream” Judaism (p. 5), which he reconstructs through occasional references to external sources, especially Josephus and Philo. The decisive difference between Paul’s self-understanding as a Jew and the generally accepted understanding of Jewishness lies in the notion of the “vocation” (p. 9) of Israel, i.e. the role that God has given to his people with respect to the Gentiles.

After a brief overview of selected scholarly positions (pp. 22-43), Windsor lays the groundwork for his argument based on investigations of the Pauline terms “Jew”, “Israelite”, “Judaism”, “Hebrew”, and “circumcision” (pp. 44-95). In Paul’s view, the distinction between Jews and non-Jews is not at all a distinction between the spheres of salvation and damnation. Rather, for Paul, Jewish identity, even under the auspices of faith in Christ, plays a – indeed the – central role. This is because Israel has received divine revelation in the Scripture and the Law of Moses (cf. Rom 3:2). From this arises its specific calling with respect to the nations. However, what that calling actually meant was a matter of controversy. Before his conversion, Paul had more or less considered himself called to champion the purity of God’s people. Subsequently, however, on the basis of his knowledge of Christ, he had come to the insight that the mission to the Gentiles was an essential element – involving those in Israel going out taking universal divine salvation. In this context he had then understood himself as called to be a missionary to the Gentiles.

In the course of the argument and development of Paul’s position in Romans, the “Jewishness of Paul’s vocation” becomes apparent (pp. 96-139). The “Servant of Christ Jesus” (Rom 1:1) introduces himself as the representative of Israel (cf. Isa 49:3 LXX). He locates the Gentile mission he is pursuing in the context of the salvation which is for all Israel and the nations and that had been promised in the prophets (cf. Isa 40-55). The apostle to the nations aligns his ministry (Rom 15:14-21) with Israel’s priestly task (cf. Isa 60f.; Jer 1).

In Rom 2:17-29, a passage which is independent and does not constitute a direct continuation of 2:1-16, Paul enters into a critical dispute with Jewish (“synagogal”) identity. The self-understanding held by the (teacher of the) Torah (vv. 17-20) is deconstructed by Paul (vv. 21-27). It causes, in his view, the opposite of what was expected, and moreover would have been surpassed by law-abiding non-Jews. Jewish identity has, for Paul, its true place within the Christ-believing community (v. 28 f.). This verse does not have Gentile Christians (as a new “true” Israel) directly in view. It is also not about salvation. Rather, Paul is seeking to enact a shift of focus regarding the calling of Israel, in which he clarifies the true role of the Law: the Law no longer calls for the doing of the commandments, but rather serves to reveal sin, in order to lead to righteousness through faith.

Windsor reads Rom 9–11 as the climax of the apostolic self-reflection in the context of his fellow Jews (pp. 195-247). The person of the apostle forms the framework of the entire section. The overall theme is the tensions arising from Paul’s apostolic-Jewish existence. a) In 9:1-5, he is not expressing his grief over Israel’s unbelief, but rather over the fact that the people of God has not perceived its calling in regard to God’s intended plan for salvation. Paul emphases the privileges given to Israel, for instance the law. The true purpose of these must, however, be understood in relation to Christ. b) Israel, for Paul, misunderstands its mission (Rom 10:1-4). 10:4 is not establishing any “new Christian pattern of religion” (p. 215). It is here speaking of Christ as the goal or fulfilment of the law. c) Paul justifies his mission to the Gentiles (Rom 10:8) through his (Christological) interpretation of the law. d) Rom 10:14-18 demonstrates that the Jewish Christian mission among the Gentiles immediately serves God’s eschatological saving work. Mainstream Judaism misunderstands this task (vv. 19-21). e) Romans 11:1 marks the turning-point of the section. Precisely in his role as missionary to the Gentiles, Paul depicts himself as the paradigm for Israel. f) In Rom 11:11-14, the Apostle binds together his own understanding of Jewish Identity with the common understanding, so that he can announce the salvation of all Israel (11:15f.). Israel, Paul hopes, is no longer at a standstill in misunderstanding its calling, but rather is being caught up, through the beginnings of the salvation of the Gentiles, in the end-times. Through his mission to the Gentiles, Paul also spurs on more fellow-Jews to acknowledge Christ.

Windsor’s work deserves credit as it will certainly stimulate further exegetical reflection. He has taken Paul’s efforts in self-assurance, by means of his appropriation of Isaiah, and placed them in reference to Paul’s statements about Judaism. Whether the potential of the texts under examination is fully exhausted within the limited framework of this fundamental concept – i.e. Paul’s apostolic-Jewish existence – remains an open question. The question cannot be exhaustively pursued here. Essentially, each individual text must be examined to see if it does not end up losing its own integrity when subjected to the overall construct of the reading of Paul Windsor has offered. For instance, with respect to Windor’s interpretation of Rom 9-11 – but also with respect to further texts, both the ones treated and the ones only touched on in his work – some critical inquiry may be made into whether the following questions have been fully fathomed: How and how deeply does faith in Christ, from Paul’s point of view, change Jewish (and Gentile) identity? And does the discourse still have to be interpreted in such a novel way?

The problem of Paul’s self-understanding as Jew and Christ-preacher ought to be discussed on further levels, beyond the framework of Windsor’s work. Consideration in this could be given not only to Paul’s dealings with markers of Jewish identity, but also to the web of relationships from non-Christ-believing Jewish, Jewish-Christian, Gentile-Christian and pagan perspectives, as well as those of early receptions of Paul. Ideally, if this were done, there may emerge the beginnings of an increasing dialogue between the current conflicting directions in Pauline studies.

Dr. Felix John

(Note: this is a translation by Lionel Windsor from the German; read the original review here)

For more on the book Paul and the Vocation of Israel:

Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul's Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to RomansWindsor, Lionel J. Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul’s Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to Romans. BZNW 205. Berlin / Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2014.

Published inRomans

Publications by Lionel Windsor:

  • Lift Your Eyes: Reflections on Ephesians

Recent blog posts

  • Photo by Daniel Lienert on UnsplashThe root of the problem (Ephesians 2:1–2)
    I hadn’t visited the dentist for years. Then I felt a tiny amount of pain in one of my teeth. But I ignored it. I didn’t want to bother with a dentist. Anyway, I had my own solution: I’d always brushed my teeth quite thoroughly, and was proud of it. So I just kept brushing. But after a while, the pain came back. This time, it was worse. So I finally visited the dentist. That was painful, too. The root had become so infected that I needed root canal surgery. That was a while ago. But last year, it flared up again, as these things apparently do. And yet I chose to visit the dentist again, even though I knew it might be painful. Why? Because I’d learnt something. I’ve learnt that if I have a problem that goes to the root, and if I know someone who has the solution to the problem, I shouldn’t ignore it or try to fix it myself. I should face up to the root problem, and get help. So I got help. Now, I don’t have a tooth in that spot at all. In Ephesians 2:1–2, Paul seeks to go deep, to the root of the problem. The problem Paul talks about here is incredibly serious. It can be very painful to admit. But Paul can and does admit it—because he also knows the person with the solution. According to Paul, this isn’t a problem to ignore or try to fix ourselves. It’s not something we can educate ourselves out of. This is a problem to face up to, and get help.
  • Captivated by ScriptureCaptivated by Scripture: A personal reflection on D. W. B. Robinson’s legacy for biblical studies
    What made Donald W. B. Robinson such an inspiring and influential teacher for generations of students? His commitment to being captivated by Scripture. This is a paper given by Lionel Windsor at the legacy day and launch of Donald Robinson Selected Works Volume 3: Biblical and Liturgical Studies & Volume 4: Historical Studies and Series Index. Moore Theological College, Sydney, 16 March 2019.
  • The first thing to say about church (Ephesians 1:22–23)
    Here in Ephesians 1:22–23, for the first time in his letter, the apostle Paul uses the word “church”. He’s taken quite some time to get to this point. That might make you think that the church isn’t very important to Paul. But actually, the reverse is true. This is a climactic statement. So far in Ephesians, Paul has poured out his praise to God for his blessings and plans and purposes. He has told his readers how he is praying for knowledge and hope and strength in God. Now, finally, at the highest peak of this amazing prayer, Paul names “the church”. So what is the first thing Paul has to say about the church? What is the word he associates most closely with the church? What matters most to Paul when it comes to the church? The answer is, in fact, obvious. It’s so obvious that you might think it doesn’t need to be said. You might even wonder why Paul bothers saying it, when there are so many other more practical things he could say about the church. But while it might seem obvious, it needs to be said first. Why? Because it’s so easy to assume it. Yet without it, nothing else about the church makes sense.
  • Grave of John BunyanStrength to live (Ephesians 1:19–21)
    What do we do when we feel weak in the face of the powers that be? One response might be just to shut down, close ranks and find a bitter satisfaction in our identity as victims. Another response might be to try to fight as hard as we can to exert our power and dominance over others, seeking to turn the tables so that we become the conquerors instead of the oppressors. Both of these responses involve seeking strength and power in ourselves. They are often the way that oppressed individuals and groups in our world respond to the powers that are oppressing them. But is that the way God wants his people to respond to our weakness in the face of power? In Ephesians 1:19–21, the apostle Paul gives us a far better way to respond. Paul’s response involves looking for strength. But it’s not a strength that comes from within ourselves. It’s a strength that comes from God himself.
  • Christ, the Cross and Creation Care ConferenceConference: Christ, the Cross and Creation Care
    I'll be speaking at the "Christ, the Cross and Creation Care Conference", Sydney. 8.30am to 3.30pm, Saturday 22 June 2019. A conference run by A Rocha Australia
  • Palatine Hill from Roman Forum with contrails – Black and WhiteWhat’s the point of theology? (Ephesians 1:17–18)
    The full name of the college I teach at is “Moore Theological College”. That word “Theological” says something important about who we are. It reminds us about what we're on about. Yes, the Bible is at the centre of everything we do. Yes, we seek to train people for ministry. Yes, we're driven by the worldwide mission of Jesus Christ. Yes, we're committed to learning together, and having our characters formed in loving Christian community. But our careful study of the Bible, and our pastorally-motivated ministry and mission training, and our encouragement of one another in our community, all matter because of something more basic: theology. Unfortunately, the word "theology" can be misunderstood. It sometimes gets used to mean something like “technical details about spiritual things that experts argue about and isn’t much practical use to regular people”. But that's just a caricature. It's not what theology is. Theology is something far more profound, far more life-changing, and far more fundamental—not just for people at a college, but for everyone. In Ephesians 1:17–18, Paul prays for his readers—people who have come to believe in and live for Jesus Christ. It's a prayer for more theology.
  • Youth praying, Finchale PrioryPrayer: What are we actually doing? (Ephesians 1:15–16)
    “A Muslim, a Jew and an Anglican Minister walk into a classroom”. This was the advertising blurb for a local Community College seminar I participated in a few years ago. I joined a Muslim educator and a Jewish academic (who is also a friend of mine) to give a series of presentations on different aspects of our three religions to interested people from the community. When we came to the topic of ‘prayer’, I was fascinated to hear what my co-presenters had to say. Even though we were all using the same word, ‘prayer’, the word meant very different things in the different religions. As a believer in Jesus Christ, what did I have to say about what prayer is? What would you have said? Christians, too, can often be a bit confused or unclear about what prayer actually is. That’s where the Apostle Paul really helps us. In these verses in Ephesians, Paul starts telling his readers about his own prayers for them.
  • Photo by Danielle Macinnes on UnsplashThe Holy Spirit: Our security (Ephesians 1:14)
    The Stanford Marshmallow Experiments are a favourite illustration of motivational speakers. The lesson is this: If you can learn how to delay gratification early in life, you’ll do better in later life. Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it? But unfortunately, like many popular conclusions drawn from famous psychological experiments, it doesn’t stand up to closer scrutiny. The more up-to-date study demonstrates something far more mundane: if you grow up in a secure home where you know there will always be food on the table, you’re more likely to be able to put off eating a marshmallow. This isn’t a particularly useful lesson for motivational speakers. But it’s a great illustration of what it means to be a child of God.
  • Mission. Photo by Ben White on UnsplashThe message is the mission (Ephesians 1:13)
    What is God’s mission? What means is God using to bring about his purposes in Christ? What does that mean for our own mission as Christians and churches?
  • Bible and the horizon. Photo by Aaron Burden on UnsplashRejoicing in the blessing of others (Ephesians 1:11–12)
    Although the Bible is always relevant to us, not every sentence is directly about us. When we realise this, we can rejoice in God’s blessings even more.

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor