Skip to content

Who’s afraid of to-do lists? Making tasks that work

List of tasks completedIn my previous post, I described how I get all the stuff out of my inboxes every day. In this post, I’ll describe how I turn all the stuff into a set of proper tasks, and integrate the tasks into my trusted system. This involves another key habit: creating tasks that actually work. This is a matter of making sure that every task I create has certain essential elements.

(This blog series is about habits and personal organisation structures I’ve developed over the years for “sustainable sacrifice” in Christian ministry. They’re specific to my own situation, so if you think any of them are worthwhile you may have to adapt them. For more information about the purpose of this series see the first post: Slip, slop, slap for sustainable sacrifice.)

The elements of a good task

I create multiple tasks each day when I process my inboxes. And every task I create has these elements:

  • The task is an action. This means it starts with a verb.
  • The task is a next action. It’s something I can actually do next.
  • The task follows the two minute rule. It’s something that will take longer than two minutes to do.
  • The task is assigned to one of my commitments. This helps me to organise it in future.
  • The task is assigned to one of my zones. This helps me to decide where and when I’ll do it.

Some tasks also need these elements:

  • If the task is time dependent, it has a defer / due date so it pops up at the right time.
  • If the tasks needs other information for me to do it, it has notes / links attached.

When the task has these elements, the task can be integrated into my trusted system (see my previous post: Building blocks of a trusted system). Without these elements for each task, I don’t have a trusted system–just a bewildering mass of stuff. That’s why this task-creating habit is so fundamental.

(By the way, this is why I’ve found email programs to be pretty useless for keeping track of tasks. Email programs simply don’t allow you to easily assign all these elements. In my experience, a proper task management system like Omnifocus is necessary for a trusted system to work).

A worked example

As I describe these elements of tasks, I’m going to use an example from real life.

A few months ago, a friend asked me in an email how I was going at walk-up evangelism. I think walk-up evangelism is a great idea, and there are plenty of opportunities to talk to people here at Moore College. But it’s not something that comes easily to me, and it’s outside my comfort zone. So I need friends to encourage and remind me–and I need to have it in my diary so I do it! So when I went through my inbox processing at end of the day, this reminder about walk-up evangelism ended up in my Omnifocus inbox:

Walk up evangelism: Inbox

But this isn’t a task. It’s just a piece of stuff. So how to turn it into a task?

Action: Start with a verb

Firstly, the task has to be an action, not just a subject. Grammatically, it has to be an imperative. In simple terms: the task has to start with a verb (= a doing word). If it doesn’t start with a verb, it’s too vague, and it just ends up being a stressful nagging piece of stuff. This might sound trivial, but it really matters. It helps me to clarify what I’m supposed to be doing. It’s definitely worth it.

So, in my example, I added the verb “Get involved [in]” to the item:

Walk-up evangelism task: Action

Next action: Can I do it next?

Secondly, the task needs to be a next action. I needs to be something I can actually do. If it’s not, then it just becomes a stressful nagging thing in my life that makes me feel guilty. If it’s something I can do, I’m far more likely to actually do it rather than feel stressed about it.

In my example, I realised that I couldn’t just “get involved” in evangelism. I had to do something more concrete first. I had to look up the details of when and where walk-up evangelism happens at Moore College, and put it into my calendar. That’s something I can do. So here was my tasks (technically there are two verbs here, but they both happen in one go):

Walk-up evangelism task: Next Action

Two minute rule: Can I do it now?

The two minute rule is part of the GTD methodology. The rule is simple: if a task is so easy that I can do it right now, in less than two minutes, then I should just do it. There’s no point putting the task into my trusted system, because it will take more time to process it to do it.

There’s a flipside to this rule, of course. If the task will take more than two minutes, I shouldn’t do it straight away. Instead, I should put it into the system. That way I can get on with processing my inboxes now, and get the task when I’m in the right zone to do it.

In the example above, I reckoned it would take more than two minutes, because I had to look up the information, and then prayerfully and carefully consider how I can integrate walk-up evangelism into my typical week.

Commitment: Why do I care?

The next thing to do is to assign the task to one of my commitments. A “commitment” is a project or sphere of life that I’ve defined earlier (see my post: Capturing wild commitments). If I don’t have a particular commitment that the task fits into, I first seriously consider whether the task actually matters, and then, if it does, I create a new commitment, and put the task into that new commitment. Assigning a commitment is vital, because it helps me to review the task, schedule it, and generally organise it to fit into life.

What does assigning a commitment to a task actually look like? In Omnifocus, it’s easy: I just fill in the “project” field (in this case “Evangelism”):

Walk-up evangelism task: Commitment

If you don’t have Omnifocus or a similar system, this might involve writing the task down in some place where you keep track of your commitments.

Zone: What zone will I do it in?

Next, I need to assign the task to a zone. This helps me to decide where and when to do the task. For more information on zones, see my post Living life in “the zone”: using zones to regulate life.

In Omnifocus, it’s easy to assign a zone: I fill in the “context” field (in this case, “Pastoral”):

Walk-up evangelism task: Zone

Defer / due: Is it time-dependent?

Some tasks are time-dependent. They either need a defer date or a due date.

First, defer dates: There are some kinds of task that I can’t start until a specific date (or time). But at that specific date it becomes a “next action”. For example, the task “Book the car in for a service”. I should do this when the car needs a service, but not before. I don’t need to be reminded of this task until later. So I assign these kinds of tasks a “defer date” so it remains dormant in my system until it’s relevant.

There are other kinds of task that need to be completed by a certain due date. For example, as a teacher at Moore College, I prepare lessons for students. Obviously, each lesson needs to be prepared before I’m due to give the class! So I need a reminder at the right time. This means I need to assign the task a “due date.” If I don’t assign due dates to these kinds of task, then I spend too much time worrying about all the possible things that are coming up. If I assign due dates, I can trust the system to remind me at the right time.

A word of caution – it’s normally best only to assign due dates for things that are definitely due at certain times. It’s a mistake to put artificial due dates or reminders to cajole myself into do things. This becomes messy and frustrating, and makes for a very clunky system. Instead, this kind of thing can all taken care of in the weekly review (which I’ll talk about in a future post).

In the case of my worked example, there were no defer or due dates.

Notes / links: What info do I need to do it?

Finally, some tasks need extra information to do them. It’s best to make sure this information is available, at my fingertips, when I come to the point of actually doing the task. This involves adding notes or links, e.g. to my email program, Evernote, websites. Many of these links are generated automatically in my earlier inbox-processing stage (see Inboxes. Getting all the stuff out of them. Every day.).

In the case of my worked example, I just added a little reminder of the website I should check out.

Walk-up evangelism task: Notes

Doing the tasks

This how I get every task, multiple times a day (well, most of the time), into my trusted system. It’s a core habit that helps me live a life of sustainable sacrifice.

Of course, the next question is: how do I go about deciding when to actually do these tasks? This is where the “weekly review” comes in. I’ll talk about my weekly review in a future post.

The posts in the series so far

  1. Slip, slop, slap for sustainable sacrifice
  2. Taming the phone 1: Minimising notifications
  3. Taming the phone 2: Putting apps in their place
  4. Building blocks of a trusted system
  5. Capturing wild commitments
  6. Living life in “the zone”: using zones to regulate life
  7. Inboxes. Getting all the stuff out of them. Every day.
  8. Who’s afraid of to-do lists? Making tasks that work
  9. The weekly review: Planning for sustainable sacrifice
  10. The trusted system: a week in the life

Published inMinistry

Publications by Lionel Windsor:

  • Lift Your Eyes: Reflections on Ephesians

Recent blog posts

  • The Shambles, York, UKBuilt together (Ephesians 2:20–22)
    Is every church on its own? How are Christian believers connected with other believers with whom we don’t meet regularly: in our region, nation, and world?
  • “Do not weep for me, weep for yourselves…” (Luke 23:28)
    Why do Christians lament? Sometimes we lament out of sympathy, but sometimes we weep for ourselves. This is the kind of lament that Jesus calls for here.
  • Busts in Vatican Museum, RomeNo second-class Christians (Ephesians 2:19)
    Even if we don’t say it out loud, we can often act as if there are different classes of Christians. But the gospel teaches us there are no second-class Christians.
  • Photo by Larm Rmah on UnsplashChrist the missionary (Ephesians 2:17–18)
    Christ is a missionary. Christ does stranger evangelism. Christ preaches to the choir. Christ crosses cultures. Christ brings peace. So says the Apostle Paul. What does he mean?
  • Fragment of the Berlin WallChrist the wall breaker (Ephesians 2:14–16)
    In this broken and rebellious world, our healthy boundaries often become hostile walls. But the cross of Christ breaks down walls and brings reconciliation.
  • Photo by John Tyson on UnsplashThe blood that brings us close (Ephesians 2:11–13)
    Despite our best desires and efforts, we humans are not very good at living up close with others. This has become devastatingly obvious in the recent Christchurch shootings. Yet in his letter to the Ephesians, Paul talks about a conflict that really was healed. This passage is about a real closeness that all believers in Christ must remember: a closeness that is fundamental to our identity.
  • Photo by foundinbklyn on Flickr (CC BY 2.0)Good works and salvation: What’s the connection? (Ephesians 2:8–10)
    A joke letter from an Australian church offering its financial donors priority access to heaven raises questions for all of us. Do our good deeds give us access to heaven? Or are our good deeds irrelevant? Where do our good deeds fit when it comes to salvation?
  • Security Threat. Photo by Andrew Neel on UnsplashA question of security (Ephesians 2:6–7)
    As I write this, New Zealand is shocked and grieving. My own nation Australia is shocked and grieving too, along with them. But news stories about terror attacks and shootings in our world are far too common, aren’t they? And whenever we hear of them, they bring to mind all sorts of questions. One of them is the question of security. As we grieve for the victims, we also think a little about ourselves. We wonder whether some day we too might be in the wrong place at the wrong time when a seemingly random attack happens. It’s unsettling. It’s not just a matter of national security; it’s also a matter of our own personal security. Paul is talking in Ephesians 2:6–7 about a security that belongs to everyone who believes in Jesus Christ. It’s not a guarantee of perfect national security or job security or financial security or security in relationships and health. Nor is it a guarantee that we will always feel perfectly secure. But it is still a real security, more unshakeable and deep-rooted than any other kind of security could be. So what is this security, and where does it come from?
  • Walking past a telephone booth in OxfordThis love (Ephesians 2:4–5)
    “God loves you”: if I say just those three words, you may not hear what I want you to hear. This is because of a communication problem that arises whenever Christians try to talk about biblical concept of God’s “love”. When we say “love” we mean one thing—something wonderful and life-changing. But the word means quite different things to many English speakers. For example, the word “love” often means “strong desire”. So if I say “God loves you” then it might sound like I’m saying “God has strong feelings for you”. Another, increasingly common, understanding of “love” is the idea of “unconditional approval”. In this view, the way to “love” somebody is to affirm and approve of everything they do. So if I don’t approve of your actions and actively affirm everything you do, then by definition I’m not “loving” you (in fact, by definition I’m “hating” you). On this common definition of “love”, if I say “God loves you” then it might sound like I’m saying “God affirms everything about you and your actions”. But that’s not what the Bible means by God’s “love” either. Given this communication problem, how can I best explain the idea of God’s “love”? Well, it’s not actually that hard. The best way is to see how the word works when the Bible uses it. In Ephesians 2:4–5, Paul uses the word “love”. But he doesn’t just say “God loves you”. He explains and spells out what that love means. And he helps us to see what God’s love really means, and how amazing it is.
  • Entering a tomb in PompeiiWe too: the offenders (Ephesians 2:3)
    Judgmentalism. It’s a bigger problem than we think. Judgmentalism is certainly a danger for God’s people. That’s because God’s people have God’s word. God’s word helps God’s people to see how wonderful God is, and how terrible humanity is in comparison. But Ephesians 2:3 contains two highly significant, emphatic words: “we too”. We too, says Paul, were the offenders. We, too, were the disobedient. These words aren’t talking about all those horrible people “out there”. They’re talking about God’s people. And it’s something we, too, need to hear. These words tell us something incredibly important—something that we ignore at our peril.

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor