Skip to content

Paul and the Vocation of Israel

Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul's Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to RomansWindsor, Lionel J. Paul and the Vocation of Israel: How Paul’s Jewish Identity Informs his Apostolic Ministry, with Special Reference to Romans. BZNW 205. Berlin / Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2014.

Available from Walter de Gruyter (the publisher):

Also available from:

Find in a library: Worldcat

Description

The Apostle Paul was the greatest early missionary of the Christian gospel. He was also, by his own admission, an Israelite. How can both these realities coexist in one individual? This book argues that Paul viewed his mission to the Gentiles, in and of itself, as the primary expression of his Jewish identity. The concept of Israel’s divine vocation is used to shed fresh light on a number of much-debated passages in Paul’s letter to the Romans.

Thesis

Paul’s apostolic mission was his way of being Jewish. Paul was convinced that Israel had received a special divine revelation which conferred on Jews a distinct divine vocation. Paul, in other words, was committed to the view that God’s global purposes in Christ included a special place—and correspondingly a special role—for the Jewish people. Paul, through preaching Christ to the Gentiles, was in fact fulfilling Israel’s distinct divine vocation. This will be our contention in this book. (p.1)

In this book, we are seeking to examine Paul’s Jewish identity using the concept of divine vocation. In particular, we are seeking to demonstrate that Paul viewed his own apostolic vocation as the fulfilment of Israel’s divine vocation. For many of Paul’s Jewish contemporaries, Jewish identity was bound up closely with the Law of Moses, which was seen as a special gift of divine revelation to Israel. The Jews’ distinct divine vocation, in this view, consisted primarily in keeping and teaching the Law of Moses as an exemplary witness to God’s power and wisdom in the world. Paul, as a Jew, agreed with his Jewish contemporaries that the Law of Moses was a special gift of divine revelation and thus a defining feature of Jewish identity. He disagreed, however, about the place of the Law in God’s purposes. Paul read the Jewish Law principally in light of the gospel of Christ. Indeed, for Paul, the Law of Moses was primarily a witness to the gospel. Thus the divine Jewish vocation consisted, not in keeping the Law of Moses per se, but in embodying and communicating a way of life which was focussed on the gospel of Christ as the fulfilment of the Law of Moses; a way of life which issued naturally in the preaching of the gospel to non-Jews. (p. 19)

Reviews

Review of Biblical Literature:

In sum, Windsor has written an interesting thesis on Paul’s distinctively Jewish vocation to be an apostle to the gentiles. He demonstrates the cogency of a reading of the Old Testament whereby God’s purposes ran through Israel to the nations, whereby a transformed Israel would be God’s agent to transform the world. He offers a hybrid between N.T. Wright and John Barclay on the place of Israel’s story in Paul’s letters by setting out Paul’s appropriation of Israel’s missional vocation, albeit in a way that preserves Israel’s distinctive genos and without recasting it in an (anachronistically) Christanized form. There are some points of contention, such as his account of Paul vis-à-vis Jewish identity and the inferences he draws from some texts such as Gal 6:16 and Rom 10:5-8. On the whole, however, Windsor’s thesis warrants attention as a stimulating contribution to Pauline studies.

Theologische Literaturzeitung:

W.s Arbeit kommt das sicher zu weiterem exegetischen Nachdenken anregende Verdienst zu, Paulus’ Bemühung um Selbstvergewisserung mittels seiner Jesajarezeption aufgegriffen und in Bezug zu paulinischen Judentum-Aussagen gesetzt zu haben.

Contents

1. Introduction – 1

1.1 Paul’s Jewish identity – 3
1.2 The vocational dimension of Jewish identity – 9
1.3 Romans: An exercise in Jewish vocation – 15
1.4 Preview of the argument – 19

2. Review of literature – 22

2.1 Paul’s apostolic mission and Israel’s vocation – 22
2.1.1 “Patterns of religion” approaches – 22
2.1.2 Albert Schweitzer – 25
2.1.3 Johannes Munck – 26
2.1.4 Krister Stendahl – 27
2.1.5 Karl-Wilhelm Niebuhr – 28
2.1.6 Stanley Stowers – 29
2.1.7 James Dunn – 31
2.1.8 N. T. Wright – 32
2.1.9 Terence Donaldson – 35
2.2 Related issues – 36
2.2.1 The relationship between Jewish identity and Christ-believing identity – 36
2.2.2 The debate over Jewish “mission” – 40
2.2 Summary – 43

3. Paul’s language of Jewish identity – 44

3.1 Jewish distinctiveness – 45
3.1.1 “Jew” and “circumcision”: Terms of Jewish distinctiveness – 45
3.1.2 Common objections to the notion of Jewish distinctiveness in Paul – 47
3.1.2.1 Gentiles as the “seed of Abraham”? – 48
3.1.2.2 An inclusive use of “Israel” in Rom 9–11? – 48
3.1.2.3 Paul’s definition of “Israel” in terms of God’s “call” (Rom 9:6b–13) – 49
3.1.2.4 The metaphor of the olive tree (Rom 11:17–24) – 51
3.1.2.5 “We are the circumcision” (Phil 3:3) – 53
3.1.2.6 The “Israel of God” (Gal 6:16) – 55
3.1.2.7 Christians as “spiritual” Jews? (Rom 2:28–29) – 61
3.1.3 An ethnic distinctiveness – 61
3.1.4 A theological distinctiveness – 64
3.2 Jewish identity and divine revelation – 67
3.2.1 Jewish identity and the Law of Moses – 68
3.2.2 “Israelites” and divine revelation – 73
3.2.3 “Hebrews” and divine revelation – 76
3.3 Jewish identity and divine vocation – 78
3.3.1 The Law of Moses: A basis for Jewish vocation – 78
3.3.2 Abraham’s fatherhood / seed: A paradigm for Jewish vocation – 82
3.3.2.1 In Paul’s letters – 82
3.3.2.2 In Paul’s Jewish context – 84
3.3.3 “Judaism” / “zeal”: Paul’s former expression of Jewish vocation – 89
3.3.4 Paul’s opposition to alternative expressions of Jewish vocation – 93
3.4 Summary: Paul’s language of Jewish identity – 94

4. The Jewishness of Paul’s vocation (Romans 1:1–15 & 15:14–33) – 96

4.1 Paul and the Isaianic Servant – 99
4.1.1 Paul’s identification with the Isaianic Servant: Evidence – 100
4.1.2 Paul’s identification with the Isaianic Servant: Common objections – 104
4.1.2.1 Δοῦλος: A term of humility? – 104
4.1.2.2 Δοῦλος: A common term for believers? – 107
4.1.2.3 Δοῦλος: An economic or political allusion? – 109
4.1.3 Paul’s identification with the Isaianic Servant: Significance – 111
4.2 Paul and Israel’s priesthood – 112
4.2.1 Paul’s consecration – 112
4.2.2 Paul’s priestly ministry – 114
4.3 Paul and contemporary expressions of Jewish vocation – 119
4.3.1 “Proselytism”? – 121
4.3.2 Accommodation? – 126
4.3.3 Apologetics? – 127
4.3.4 Israel as a global priesthood? – 129
4.3.5 Eschatological expectations – 130
4.3.6 Apparent anomalies – 135
4.4 Summary: Paul’s fulfilment of Israel’s eschatological vocation – 137

5. Paul’s contest over Jewish identity (Romans 2:17–29) – 140

5.1 Romans 2:17–29 as an argument about Jewish identity – 140
5.1.1 The discrete function of Rom 2:17–29 within the argument of Romans – 144
5.1.2 The social context of Rom 2:17–29: the Jewish synagogue – 147
5.1.3 The unity of Rom 2:17–29 – 151
5.2 Jewish identity and the Law (Romans 2:17–20) – 152
5.2.1 The Law and Jewish privilege (Rom 2:17–18) – 153
5.2.2 The Law and Jewish vocation (Rom 2:19–20) – 156
5.2.2.1 Jewish Law and the teaching of Gentiles – 156
5.2.2.2 The identity of Paul’s interlocutor – 161
5.3 Jewish identity deconstructed (Romans 2:21–27) – 163
5.3.1 The failure of Law-teaching (Rom 2:21–24) – 163
5.3.1.1 Jewish transgression of the Law (vv. 21–22) – 164
5.3.1.2 The failure of Jewish vocation to the nations (vv. 23–24) – 168
5.3.2 The failure of circumcision (Rom 2:25–27) – 170
5.3.2.1 A commonly held truth (v. 25) – 174
5.3.2.2 A contested issue (v. 26) – 176
5.3.2.3 The radical consequences (v. 27) – 180
5.4 Jewish identity redefined (Romans 2:28–29) – 181
5.4.1 Jewish identity: Not in the mainstream synagogue – 184
5.4.2 Jewish identity: Within the Christ-believing community – 185
5.4.3 Jewish honour: Not from people, but from God – 189
5.5 Summary: Paul’s contest over Jewish identity – 191

6. Paul’s fulfilment of Israel’s vocation (Romans 9–11) – 195

6.1 Paul’s vocation: The framework for Romans 9–11 – 195
6.1.1 The prominence of Paul’s persona in Rom 9–11 – 196
6.1.2 Tensions concerning Israel’s vocation in Rom 9–11 – 198
6.1.3 Paul’s first-person resolution of these tensions – 200
6.2 Paul and Israel: Conflicting vocations (Romans 9:1–5) – 202
6.2.1 The apostolic identification with Israel (Rom 9:1–3) – 203
6.2.2 Israel’s purpose in light of the apostolic vocation (Rom 9:4–5) – 206
6.3 Paul and Israel: Competing vocations (Romans 10) – 210
6.3.1 Israel’s failed vocation (Rom 10:1–4) – 212
6.3.2 The apostolic preaching vocation (Rom 10:5–13) – 216
6.3.3 The apostolic fulfilment of Israel’s vocation (Rom 10:14–18) – 220
6.3.4 The ongoing failure of Israel’s vocation (Rom 10:19–21) – 228
6.4 Paul and Israel: Converging vocations (Romans 11) – 230
6.4.1 The apostle as the paradigmatic Israelite (Rom 11:1–2a) – 231
6.4.1.1 The inadequacy of alternative proposals – 232
6.4.1.2 Paul’s self-description and Israel’s vocation – 235
6.4.2 The apostle against Israel (Rom 11:2b–10) – 239
6.4.3 The apostle and Israel: Complementary vocations (Rom 11:11–14) – 240
6.4.4 The apostle and Israel: Corresponding vocations (Rom 11:15–16) – 244
6.4.5 The apostle’s vocation and Israel’s salvation – 244
6.5 Summary: Paul’s fulfilment of Israel’s vocation in Romans 9–11 – 246

7. Conclusions – 248

7.1 Summary of the argument – 249
7.2 Implications for further study – 252

Publication background

The book is a revised version of Lionel Windsor’s PhD thesis, completed at Durham University in 2012. Supervisor: Francis Watson. Examiners: John Barclay and William S. Campbell.

The series BZNW

The series Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft (BZNW) is one of the oldest and most highly regarded international scholarly book series in the field of New Testament studies. Since 1923 it has been a forum for seminal works focusing on Early Christianity and related fields. The series is grounded in a historical-critical approach and also explores new methodological approaches that advance our understanding of the New Testament and its world.

Series editors: James D. G. Dunn, Carl R. Holladay, Matthias Konradt, Hermann Lichtenberger, Jens Schröter and Gregory E. Sterling.

Further information

More on the content of the book:

Recent blog posts

  • Entering a tomb in PompeiiWe too: the offenders (Ephesians 2:3)
    Judgmentalism. It’s a bigger problem than we think. Judgmentalism is certainly a danger for God’s people. That’s because God’s people have God’s word. God’s word helps God’s people to see how wonderful God is, and how terrible humanity is in comparison. But Ephesians 2:3 contains two highly significant, emphatic words: “we too”. We too, says Paul, were the offenders. We, too, were the disobedient. These words aren’t talking about all those horrible people “out there”. They’re talking about God’s people. And it’s something we, too, need to hear. These words tell us something incredibly important—something that we ignore at our peril.
  • Photo by Daniel Lienert on UnsplashThe root of the problem (Ephesians 2:1–2)
    I hadn’t visited the dentist for years. Then I felt a tiny amount of pain in one of my teeth. But I ignored it. I didn’t want to bother with a dentist. Anyway, I had my own solution: I’d always brushed my teeth quite thoroughly, and was proud of it. So I just kept brushing. But after a while, the pain came back. This time, it was worse. So I finally visited the dentist. That was painful, too. The root had become so infected that I needed root canal surgery. That was a while ago. But last year, it flared up again, as these things apparently do. And yet I chose to visit the dentist again, even though I knew it might be painful. Why? Because I’d learnt something. I’ve learnt that if I have a problem that goes to the root, and if I know someone who has the solution to the problem, I shouldn’t ignore it or try to fix it myself. I should face up to the root problem, and get help. So I got help. Now, I don’t have a tooth in that spot at all. In Ephesians 2:1–2, Paul seeks to go deep, to the root of the problem. The problem Paul talks about here is incredibly serious. It can be very painful to admit. But Paul can and does admit it—because he also knows the person with the solution. According to Paul, this isn’t a problem to ignore or try to fix ourselves. It’s not something we can educate ourselves out of. This is a problem to face up to, and get help.
  • Captivated by ScriptureCaptivated by Scripture: A personal reflection on D. W. B. Robinson’s legacy for biblical studies
    What made Donald W. B. Robinson such an inspiring and influential teacher for generations of students? His commitment to being captivated by Scripture. This is a paper given by Lionel Windsor at the legacy day and launch of Donald Robinson Selected Works Volume 3: Biblical and Liturgical Studies & Volume 4: Historical Studies and Series Index. Moore Theological College, Sydney, 16 March 2019.
  • The first thing to say about church (Ephesians 1:22–23)
    Here in Ephesians 1:22–23, for the first time in his letter, the apostle Paul uses the word “church”. He’s taken quite some time to get to this point. That might make you think that the church isn’t very important to Paul. But actually, the reverse is true. This is a climactic statement. So far in Ephesians, Paul has poured out his praise to God for his blessings and plans and purposes. He has told his readers how he is praying for knowledge and hope and strength in God. Now, finally, at the highest peak of this amazing prayer, Paul names “the church”. So what is the first thing Paul has to say about the church? What is the word he associates most closely with the church? What matters most to Paul when it comes to the church? The answer is, in fact, obvious. It’s so obvious that you might think it doesn’t need to be said. You might even wonder why Paul bothers saying it, when there are so many other more practical things he could say about the church. But while it might seem obvious, it needs to be said first. Why? Because it’s so easy to assume it. Yet without it, nothing else about the church makes sense.
  • Grave of John BunyanStrength to live (Ephesians 1:19–21)
    What do we do when we feel weak in the face of the powers that be? One response might be just to shut down, close ranks and find a bitter satisfaction in our identity as victims. Another response might be to try to fight as hard as we can to exert our power and dominance over others, seeking to turn the tables so that we become the conquerors instead of the oppressors. Both of these responses involve seeking strength and power in ourselves. They are often the way that oppressed individuals and groups in our world respond to the powers that are oppressing them. But is that the way God wants his people to respond to our weakness in the face of power? In Ephesians 1:19–21, the apostle Paul gives us a far better way to respond. Paul’s response involves looking for strength. But it’s not a strength that comes from within ourselves. It’s a strength that comes from God himself.
  • Christ, the Cross and Creation Care ConferenceConference: Christ, the Cross and Creation Care
    I'll be speaking at the "Christ, the Cross and Creation Care Conference", Sydney. 8.30am to 3.30pm, Saturday 22 June 2019. A conference run by A Rocha Australia
  • Palatine Hill from Roman Forum with contrails – Black and WhiteWhat’s the point of theology? (Ephesians 1:17–18)
    The full name of the college I teach at is “Moore Theological College”. That word “Theological” says something important about who we are. It reminds us about what we're on about. Yes, the Bible is at the centre of everything we do. Yes, we seek to train people for ministry. Yes, we're driven by the worldwide mission of Jesus Christ. Yes, we're committed to learning together, and having our characters formed in loving Christian community. But our careful study of the Bible, and our pastorally-motivated ministry and mission training, and our encouragement of one another in our community, all matter because of something more basic: theology. Unfortunately, the word "theology" can be misunderstood. It sometimes gets used to mean something like “technical details about spiritual things that experts argue about and isn’t much practical use to regular people”. But that's just a caricature. It's not what theology is. Theology is something far more profound, far more life-changing, and far more fundamental—not just for people at a college, but for everyone. In Ephesians 1:17–18, Paul prays for his readers—people who have come to believe in and live for Jesus Christ. It's a prayer for more theology.
  • Youth praying, Finchale PrioryPrayer: What are we actually doing? (Ephesians 1:15–16)
    “A Muslim, a Jew and an Anglican Minister walk into a classroom”. This was the advertising blurb for a local Community College seminar I participated in a few years ago. I joined a Muslim educator and a Jewish academic (who is also a friend of mine) to give a series of presentations on different aspects of our three religions to interested people from the community. When we came to the topic of ‘prayer’, I was fascinated to hear what my co-presenters had to say. Even though we were all using the same word, ‘prayer’, the word meant very different things in the different religions. As a believer in Jesus Christ, what did I have to say about what prayer is? What would you have said? Christians, too, can often be a bit confused or unclear about what prayer actually is. That’s where the Apostle Paul really helps us. In these verses in Ephesians, Paul starts telling his readers about his own prayers for them.
  • Photo by Danielle Macinnes on UnsplashThe Holy Spirit: Our security (Ephesians 1:14)
    The Stanford Marshmallow Experiments are a favourite illustration of motivational speakers. The lesson is this: If you can learn how to delay gratification early in life, you’ll do better in later life. Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it? But unfortunately, like many popular conclusions drawn from famous psychological experiments, it doesn’t stand up to closer scrutiny. The more up-to-date study demonstrates something far more mundane: if you grow up in a secure home where you know there will always be food on the table, you’re more likely to be able to put off eating a marshmallow. This isn’t a particularly useful lesson for motivational speakers. But it’s a great illustration of what it means to be a child of God.
  • Mission. Photo by Ben White on UnsplashThe message is the mission (Ephesians 1:13)
    What is God’s mission? What means is God using to bring about his purposes in Christ? What does that mean for our own mission as Christians and churches?

On this site

All content copyright Lionel Windsor